0 Comments
58
74
18
-16
345
8:11
11
1
-13%
Teams advantage Nuke (M0)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
71%
Nuke
67%
Dust II
43%
Anubis
43%
Vertigo
38%
Inferno
25%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
71%
24
0
Nuke
67%
12
0
Dust II
43%
7
0
Anubis
43%
14
2
Vertigo
38%
8
2
Inferno
25%
4
5
Mirage
0%
2
7
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
2
0
Nuke
0%
2
0
Dust II
0%
0
1
Anubis
0%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
1
Inferno
0%
0
1
Mirage
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllww
- llll
Info
Map Analysis of DASH vs Souls Heart by the Bo3.gg Team
DASH on Nuke Analysis
DASH demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for DASH on Nuke were Flierax, who contributed 17 kills, and nifee3, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 7527 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, DASH held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Souls Heart on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Souls Heart, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Souls Heart on Nuke included njuki, who contributed 12 kills, and dezz, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6563 total damage, Souls Heart couldn't prevent DASH from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, Souls Heart struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments