Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
41.6027
Galil kills on a map
31.8164
Assists on a map
84.4315
Player score (round)
35581010
Damage (total/round)
39273
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
60%
Anubis
43%
Inferno
33%
Nuke
31%
Dust II
10%
Vertigo
10%
Ancient
4%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
5
Anubis
29%
7
2
Inferno
33%
3
3
Nuke
58%
12
0
Dust II
60%
5
0
Vertigo
40%
5
2
Ancient
79%
19
0
Last 5 maps
Mirage
60%
20
0
Anubis
72%
18
0
Inferno
0%
0
6
Nuke
27%
11
3
Dust II
50%
6
1
Vertigo
30%
10
2
Ancient
75%
32
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwlwl
- lwwww
Info
Match analysis of DASH vs NAVI Junior by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between DASH and NAVI Junior, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by NAVI Junior. The MVP of this match was makazze.
NAVI Junior analytics
The team NAVI Junior secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for NAVI Junior were makazze contributed 17 kills and Krabeni contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7329 overall damage.
On the defensive side, NAVI Junior held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
DASH analytics
The team DASH managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for DASH were Psycho contributed 13 kills and Dawy_ contributed 8 kills. 4500 of total damage by DASH could not prevent NAVI Junior from securing the victory
On the defensive side, DASH struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments