0 Comments
99
106
31
-7
351
15:15
23
3
+2%
Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
53%
Inferno
33%
Vertigo
17%
Overpass
0%
Nuke
0%
Mirage
0%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
14%
7
0
Inferno
0%
0
4
Vertigo
67%
3
0
Overpass
0%
1
2
Nuke
0%
1
1
Mirage
50%
4
2
Ancient
56%
9
0
Last 5 maps
Anubis
67%
6
0
Inferno
33%
3
0
Vertigo
50%
2
0
Overpass
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Mirage
50%
2
0
Ancient
56%
9
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwlw
- wwlwl
Info
Map Analysis of CYBERSHOKE vs Secret by the Bo3.gg Team
Secret on Anubis Analysis
Secret demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Secret on Anubis were Kind0, who contributed 24 kills, and anarkez, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 11322 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Secret held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
CYBERSHOKE on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for CYBERSHOKE, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Anubis included Fen2k, who contributed 23 kills, and FenomeN, who added 22 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10517 total damage, CYBERSHOKE couldn't prevent Secret from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, CYBERSHOKE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments