CYBERSHOKE Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

8

5

+11

92

4:0

5

2

9.1

+35%

15

11

5

+4

92

1:0

5

1

7.2

+10%

13

12

10

+1

100

3:3

4

0

6.9

+23%

16

12

4

+4

98

1:3

5

0

6.8

+16%

15

9

8

+6

81

2:1

5

0

6.7

+12%

Total

78

52

32

+26

463

11:7

24

3

7.4

+19%

Revenant Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

14

17

3

-3

76

3:5

5

0

5.8

-9%

8

13

3

-5

59

0:1

2

2

5.3

-14%

10

16

6

-6

84

1:2

2

0

5.2

-17%

9

16

4

-7

69

3:2

2

0

5.2

-15%

10

17

3

-7

64

0:1

3

0

4.9

-27%

Total

51

79

19

-28

352

7:11

14

2

5.3

-16%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of CYBERSHOKE vs Revenant by the Bo3.gg Team

CYBERSHOKE on Anubis Analysis

CYBERSHOKE demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Anubis were notineki, who contributed 19 kills, and lov1kus, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8331 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, CYBERSHOKE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Revenant on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Revenant, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Revenant on Anubis included lauNX, who contributed 14 kills, and NBK-, who added 8 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6335 total damage, Revenant couldn't prevent CYBERSHOKE from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Revenant struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date