CYBERSHOKE Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

12

5

+5

102

1:0

4

0

7.3

+16%

11

12

5

-1

77

3:4

3

0

6.0

0%

9

12

2

-3

61

0:2

2

0

4.9

-11%

6

10

3

-4

40

0:3

1

0

4.3

-24%

6

11

4

-5

58

0:4

1

0

4.2

-14%

Total

49

57

19

-8

338

4:13

11

0

5.4

-7%

Insilio Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

21

12

2

+9

135

5:1

7

1

9.3

+44%

10

9

4

+1

71

4:0

2

1

6.8

+4%

11

8

2

+3

72

1:1

3

1

6.4

+7%

8

11

4

-3

59

1:1

3

0

5.4

-18%

7

10

1

-3

36

2:1

1

0

5.0

-28%

Total

57

50

13

+7

373

13:4

16

3

6.6

+2%

Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of CYBERSHOKE vs Insilio by the Bo3.gg Team

Insilio on Anubis Analysis

Insilio demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Insilio on Anubis were Polt, who contributed 21 kills, and sugaR, who added 10 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 6344 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Insilio held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


CYBERSHOKE on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for CYBERSHOKE, as they managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Anubis included Re1GN, who contributed 17 kills, and sh1nejezzz, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5746 total damage, CYBERSHOKE couldn't prevent Insilio from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, CYBERSHOKE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date