Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:29s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:31s01:55s
Player score (round)
38571010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Knife kills
11
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
45%
Nuke
45%
Anubis
23%
Ancient
12%
Mirage
8%
Vertigo
7%
Inferno
5%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
45%
11
12
Nuke
33%
6
17
Anubis
70%
46
2
Ancient
42%
26
1
Mirage
67%
15
2
Vertigo
43%
23
4
Inferno
50%
10
17
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
2
8
Nuke
78%
9
1
Anubis
47%
17
0
Ancient
30%
10
1
Mirage
75%
4
7
Vertigo
50%
4
5
Inferno
55%
11
3
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwlll
- lwllw
Info
Match analysis of CYBERSHOKE vs Grannys Knockers by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between CYBERSHOKE and Grannys Knockers, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by CYBERSHOKE. The MVP of this match was levantino.
CYBERSHOKE analytics
The team CYBERSHOKE secured 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE were levantino contributed 23 kills and FenomeN contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9985 overall damage.
On the defensive side, CYBERSHOKE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Grannys Knockers analytics
The team Grannys Knockers managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Grannys Knockers were Sidivo contributed 20 kills and StreakN contributed 18 kills. 8106 of total damage by Grannys Knockers could not prevent CYBERSHOKE from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Grannys Knockers struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments