CYBERSHOKE Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

12

15

8

-3

85

3:2

3

0

6.1

+4%

11

15

2

-4

59

2:0

1

0

5.7

-24%

10

13

5

-3

60

1:2

2

0

5.4

-22%

10

16

4

-6

69

2:3

2

0

5.2

-22%

8

14

2

-6

51

0:3

1

0

4.4

-33%

Total

51

73

21

-22

325

8:10

9

0

5.4

-19%

Endpoint Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

7

6

+11

95

0:1

6

1

7.7

+39%

17

11

3

+6

87

3:0

4

0

7.6

+22%

14

13

4

+1

96

4:3

3

0

7.2

+7%

15

9

4

+6

81

1:2

4

0

6.2

+34%

8

11

7

-3

65

2:2

3

0

5.3

-14%

Total

72

51

24

+21

424

10:8

20

1

6.8

+18%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of CYBERSHOKE vs Endpoint by the Bo3.gg Team

Endpoint on Anubis Analysis

Endpoint demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Endpoint on Anubis were Surreal, who contributed 18 kills, and cej0t, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7632 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Endpoint held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


CYBERSHOKE on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for CYBERSHOKE, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Anubis included levantino, who contributed 12 kills, and notineki, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5845 total damage, CYBERSHOKE couldn't prevent Endpoint from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, CYBERSHOKE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date