0 Comments
56
74
22
-18
314
8:11
10
2
-8%
Teams advantage Mirage (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
- —
- Starter
- —
- —
- —
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
70%
Inferno
64%
Mirage
30%
Anubis
19%
Vertigo
4%
Ancient
1%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
1
2
Inferno
0%
0
4
Mirage
33%
3
2
Anubis
17%
6
0
Vertigo
67%
3
0
Ancient
56%
9
0
Nuke
0%
1
1
Last 5 maps
Overpass
70%
10
6
Inferno
64%
22
10
Mirage
63%
19
6
Anubis
36%
14
18
Vertigo
71%
17
8
Ancient
57%
30
6
Nuke
0%
0
40
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllww
- wlllw
Info
Map Analysis of CYBERSHOKE vs Endpoint by the Bo3.gg Team
Endpoint on Mirage Analysis
Endpoint demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Endpoint on Mirage were sl3nd, who contributed 18 kills, and MiGHTYMAX, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 7994 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Mirage, Endpoint held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
CYBERSHOKE on Mirage Analysis
Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for CYBERSHOKE, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Mirage included FenomeN, who contributed 16 kills, and Re1GN, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5974 total damage, CYBERSHOKE couldn't prevent Endpoint from securing victory on Mirage
On the defensive side of Mirage, CYBERSHOKE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments