0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:22s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:27s01:55s
Player score (round)
40581010
Clutch (opponents)
3
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
43%
Dust II
10%
Anubis
7%
Vertigo
4%
Ancient
4%
Inferno
3%
Mirage
2%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
17%
6
40
Dust II
47%
15
28
Anubis
64%
74
2
Vertigo
34%
35
5
Ancient
55%
47
2
Inferno
39%
23
25
Mirage
61%
31
4
Last 5 maps
Nuke
60%
40
8
Dust II
57%
7
39
Anubis
57%
47
8
Vertigo
38%
21
11
Ancient
51%
85
3
Inferno
42%
24
14
Mirage
59%
69
5
Last results
Past matches
- wwwlw
- lwlwl
Info
Match analysis of CYBERSHOKE vs CPH Wolves by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between CYBERSHOKE and CPH Wolves, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by CPH Wolves. The MVP of this match was MAGILA.
CPH Wolves analytics
The team CPH Wolves secured 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for CPH Wolves were MAGILA contributed 19 kills and Tapewaare contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8240 overall damage.
On the defensive side, CPH Wolves held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
CYBERSHOKE analytics
The team CYBERSHOKE managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE were lov1kus contributed 20 kills and FenomeN contributed 14 kills. 6239 of total damage by CYBERSHOKE could not prevent CPH Wolves from securing the victory
On the defensive side, CYBERSHOKE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments