BetBoom Scoreboard Train (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

17

10

+4

0

0:0

0

0

0%

18

20

4

-2

0

0:0

0

0

0%

28

18

3

+10

0

0:0

0

0

0%

14

16

11

-2

0

0:0

0

0

0%

27

21

9

+6

0

0:0

0

0

0%

Total

108

92

37

+16

0

0:0

0

0

0.0

0%

CYBERSHOKE Scoreboard Train (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

22

18

-5

0

0:0

0

0

0%

18

24

5

-6

0

0:0

0

0

0%

21

19

4

+2

0

0:0

0

0

0%

16

21

4

-5

0

0:0

0

0

0%

20

22

5

-2

0

0:0

0

0

0%

Total

92

108

36

-16

0

0:0

0

0

0.0

0%

Teams advantage Train (M1)
There are currently no game data
Info
Map Analysis of BetBoom vs CYBERSHOKE by the Bo3.gg Team

BetBoom on Train Analysis

BetBoom demonstrated their prowers on Train, securing 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for BetBoom on Train were Boombl4, who contributed 21 kills, and Ax1Le, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Train, the team inflicted a total of 0 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Train, BetBoom held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


CYBERSHOKE on Train Analysis

Train proved to be a challenging battleground for CYBERSHOKE, as they managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Train included glowiing, who contributed 17 kills, and lov1kus, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 0 total damage, CYBERSHOKE couldn't prevent BetBoom from securing victory on Train


On the defensive side of Train, CYBERSHOKE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date