0 Comments
85
61
26
+24
380
14:9
21
0
+17%
Teams advantage Mirage (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Stand-in
Starter
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
61%
Overpass
56%
Nuke
42%
Anubis
38%
Vertigo
12%
Ancient
9%
Mirage
2%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
4
Overpass
0%
1
2
Nuke
0%
1
1
Anubis
17%
6
0
Vertigo
67%
3
0
Ancient
56%
9
0
Mirage
50%
4
2
Last 5 maps
Inferno
61%
18
10
Overpass
56%
9
30
Nuke
42%
12
12
Anubis
55%
22
3
Vertigo
55%
11
14
Ancient
65%
20
7
Mirage
48%
21
11
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwwl
- lwlww
Info
Map Analysis of CYBERSHOKE vs ARCRED by the Bo3.gg Team
CYBERSHOKE on Mirage Analysis
CYBERSHOKE demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Mirage were Re1GN, who contributed 24 kills, and flamie, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 8729 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Mirage, CYBERSHOKE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ARCRED on Mirage Analysis
Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for ARCRED, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ARCRED on Mirage included 1NVISIBLE, who contributed 19 kills, and DSSj, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7368 total damage, ARCRED couldn't prevent CYBERSHOKE from securing victory on Mirage
On the defensive side of Mirage, ARCRED struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments