0 Comments
43
66
21
-23
319
12:4
8
1
-13%
Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
- —
- Starter
- —
- —
- —
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
67%
Anubis
47%
Mirage
25%
Ancient
20%
Inferno
0%
Overpass
0%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
67%
3
0
Anubis
33%
12
0
Mirage
50%
4
2
Ancient
60%
10
0
Inferno
0%
0
4
Overpass
0%
1
2
Nuke
0%
1
1
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
1
Anubis
80%
5
0
Mirage
75%
4
0
Ancient
40%
5
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
1
Nuke
0%
0
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwww
- lwwwl
Info
Map Analysis of CYBERSHOKE vs 1WIN Academy by the Bo3.gg Team
1WIN Academy on Anubis Analysis
1WIN Academy demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for 1WIN Academy on Anubis were latt1kk, who contributed 14 kills, and buster, who added 13 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 6845 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, 1WIN Academy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
CYBERSHOKE on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for CYBERSHOKE, as they managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Anubis included Re1GN, who contributed 10 kills, and flamie, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5096 total damage, CYBERSHOKE couldn't prevent 1WIN Academy from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, CYBERSHOKE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments