0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Deagle kills on a map
41.6672
Deagle kills on a map
51.6672
Assists on a map
94.4098
Trades on a map
7.023.4638
Assists on a map
10.084.4098
Clutch (opponents)
2
Knife kills
11
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
55%
Vertigo
49%
Inferno
45%
Dust II
33%
Ancient
29%
Anubis
13%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
0
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Ancient
25%
4
0
Anubis
50%
2
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Mirage
55%
38
8
Vertigo
51%
37
3
Inferno
45%
20
11
Dust II
33%
3
5
Ancient
54%
56
1
Anubis
63%
38
6
Nuke
0%
0
40
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- ww
- lwlww
Info
Match analysis of Denial vs Passion UA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Denial and Passion UA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by Passion UA. The MVP of this match was s-chilla.
Passion UA analytics
The team Passion UA secured 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Passion UA were s-chilla contributed 18 kills and Jambo contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7635 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Denial analytics
The team Denial managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Denial were Andree contributed 16 kills and mertz contributed 11 kills. 6309 of total damage by Denial could not prevent Passion UA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Denial struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments