0 Comments
90
67
18
+23
404
15:8
27
3
+12%
Teams advantage Vertigo (M3)
Records Vertigo
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
123
AK47 kills on a map
156.732
AK47 damage (avg/round)
69.625.3
HE damage (avg/round)
11.83.4
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:35s00:39s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
6230
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.32
Trades on a map
8.973.5084
HE damage (total/round)
10726.8
HE damage (total/round)
14126.8
Info
Map Analysis of Copenhagen Flames vs NAVI Junior by the Bo3.gg Team
Copenhagen Flames on Vertigo Analysis
Copenhagen Flames demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Copenhagen Flames on Vertigo were raalz, who contributed 26 kills, and b0RUP, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 9299 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Copenhagen Flames held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
NAVI Junior on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for NAVI Junior, as they managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for NAVI Junior on Vertigo included npl, who contributed 25 kills, and froz1k, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7647 total damage, NAVI Junior couldn't prevent Copenhagen Flames from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, NAVI Junior struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments