0 Comments
108
92
23
+16
385
18:12
28
0
+5%
Teams advantage Ancient (M1)
Records Ancient
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:24s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:35s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:31s01:30s
Flash duration on a map (sec)
02:24s00:39s
USP kills on a map
51.616
Speed Round (sec)
00:33s01:54s
Shots (total/round)
8516
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:17s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:20s00:05s
Info
Map Analysis of Copenhagen Flames vs GTZ by the Bo3.gg Team
Copenhagen Flames on Ancient Analysis
Copenhagen Flames demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Copenhagen Flames on Ancient were TMB, who contributed 25 kills, and regali, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 11554 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, Copenhagen Flames held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
GTZ on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for GTZ, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for GTZ on Ancient included Shr, who contributed 28 kills, and snapy, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10532 total damage, GTZ couldn't prevent Copenhagen Flames from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, GTZ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments