0 Comments
97
117
30
-20
319
12:22
14
2
-11%
Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Records Inferno
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:33s01:30s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
8730
Smoke thrown on a map
3215.0371
Flash duration on a map (sec)
02:06s00:39s
Smoke thrown on a map
3015.0371
Eco wins full buy
1
Shots (total/round)
10016
Shots (total/round)
9516
Player score (round)
51821012
Info
Map Analysis of Copenhagen Flames vs GamerLegion by the Bo3.gg Team
GamerLegion on Inferno Analysis
GamerLegion demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 19 out of 34 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for GamerLegion on Inferno were siuhy, who contributed 35 kills, and isak, who added 25 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 12540 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, GamerLegion held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Copenhagen Flames on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Copenhagen Flames, as they managed to secure 15 out of 34 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Copenhagen Flames on Inferno included regali, who contributed 28 kills, and TMB, who added 24 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10855 total damage, Copenhagen Flames couldn't prevent GamerLegion from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Copenhagen Flames struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments