0 Comments
305
314
61
-9
376
40:50
64
6
Inferno6.5
-1%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
56%
Nuke
55%
Vertigo
27%
Ancient
9%
Dust II
6%
Inferno
1%
Overpass
1%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
2
29
Nuke
55%
11
5
Vertigo
69%
13
2
Ancient
75%
24
0
Dust II
50%
10
15
Inferno
58%
12
8
Overpass
44%
9
8
Last 5 maps
Mirage
56%
50
4
Nuke
0%
0
63
Vertigo
42%
26
23
Ancient
66%
35
12
Dust II
56%
36
7
Inferno
59%
61
2
Overpass
45%
33
24
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwllw
- llwlw
Info
Match analysis of Copenhagen Flames vs ECLOT by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Copenhagen Flames and ECLOT, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Overpass, Ancient, Inferno, and victory was secured by ECLOT. The MVP of this match was Valencio.
ECLOT analytics
The team ECLOT secured 0 out of 90 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ECLOT were Valencio contributed 75 kills and nbqq contributed 73 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 33938 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ECLOT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Copenhagen Flames analytics
The team Copenhagen Flames managed to secure 90 out of 90 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 10 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Copenhagen Flames were b0RUP contributed 66 kills and regali contributed 77 kills. 33676 of total damage by Copenhagen Flames could not prevent ECLOT from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Copenhagen Flames struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 36 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments