Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
136.5019
Deagle kills on a map
51.6558
Deagle kills on a map
41.6558
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
75%
Mirage
23%
Inferno
18%
Anubis
15%
Nuke
10%
Ancient
10%
Vertigo
3%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
12
Mirage
48%
33
1
Inferno
55%
11
7
Anubis
50%
20
1
Nuke
57%
21
5
Ancient
56%
62
0
Vertigo
45%
11
2
Last 5 maps
Dust II
25%
4
0
Mirage
25%
4
10
Inferno
73%
11
1
Anubis
35%
20
2
Nuke
47%
15
1
Ancient
46%
39
0
Vertigo
42%
12
2
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwll
- llwll
Info
Match analysis of CPH Wolves vs Viperio by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between CPH Wolves and Viperio, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by CPH Wolves. The MVP of this match was Swicher.
CPH Wolves analytics
The team CPH Wolves secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for CPH Wolves were BøghmagiC contributed 17 kills and Szejn contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8541 overall damage.
On the defensive side, CPH Wolves held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Viperio analytics
The team Viperio managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Viperio were Swicher contributed 23 kills and Skrimo contributed 18 kills. 7968 of total damage by Viperio could not prevent CPH Wolves from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Viperio struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments