CPH Wolves Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

9

12

2

-3

61

3:2

1

0

5.4

-10%

8

12

1

-4

60

2:1

2

0

5.1

-20%

7

13

2

-6

64

0:1

1

0

4.9

-26%

7

13

1

-6

63

0:2

1

0

4.6

-26%

3

11

1

-8

30

1:4

1

0

3.3

-43%

Total

34

61

7

-27

278

6:10

6

0

4.7

-25%

kONO Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

16

8

6

+8

109

3:1

6

0

8.1

+28%

16

7

2

+9

96

1:1

5

0

7.7

+37%

13

9

6

+4

92

4:3

4

0

7.4

+22%

12

5

3

+7

63

1:0

4

1

6.8

+19%

4

5

7

-1

38

1:1

0

0

4.9

-16%

Total

61

34

24

+27

397

10:6

19

1

7.0

+18%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of CPH Wolves vs kONO by the Bo3.gg Team

kONO on Inferno Analysis

kONO demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for kONO on Inferno were kensizor, who contributed 16 kills, and Polbandana, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 6354 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, kONO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


CPH Wolves on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for CPH Wolves, as they managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for CPH Wolves on Inferno included Tapewaare, who contributed 9 kills, and Szejn, who added 8 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4454 total damage, CPH Wolves couldn't prevent kONO from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, CPH Wolves struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date