0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
G
80%
Overpass
G
50%
Vertigo
50%
Inferno
42%
Nuke
G
33%
Anubis
G
17%
Ancient
G
7%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
20%
5
0
Overpass
50%
2
0
Vertigo
50%
2
1
Inferno
67%
3
1
Nuke
0%
0
2
Anubis
0%
1
0
Ancient
43%
14
0
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
2
1
Overpass
100%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
1
Inferno
25%
4
0
Nuke
33%
3
0
Anubis
17%
6
0
Ancient
50%
8
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwwl
- lwwlw
Info
Map Analysis of CPH Wolves vs Grindas by the Bo3.gg Team
Grindas on Inferno Analysis
Grindas demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Grindas on Inferno were BaGyZ, who contributed 21 kills, and StreakN, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9054 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Grindas held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
CPH Wolves on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for CPH Wolves, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for CPH Wolves on Inferno included Svedjehed, who contributed 20 kills, and Fessor, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5608 total damage, CPH Wolves couldn't prevent Grindas from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, CPH Wolves struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments