CPH Wolves Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

13

5

+9

92

1:1

3

1

7.2

+23%

18

12

6

+6

67

3:0

2

0

6.7

+20%

17

17

9

0

91

3:1

5

0

6.6

+12%

16

17

7

-1

87

3:3

5

0

6.5

+1%

14

15

7

-1

74

4:4

4

0

5.9

+6%

Total

87

74

34

+13

412

14:9

19

1

6.6

+12%

ECLOT Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

20

8

0

97

4:1

5

1

7.6

+4%

17

17

3

0

76

4:4

3

1

6.8

-2%

13

16

4

-3

69

0:5

3

2

5.6

-10%

13

19

5

-6

61

1:2

3

0

5.1

-15%

11

16

7

-5

58

0:2

1

0

5.0

-21%

Total

74

88

27

-14

362

9:14

15

4

6.0

-9%

Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of CPH Wolves vs ECLOT by the Bo3.gg Team

CPH Wolves on Anubis Analysis

CPH Wolves demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for CPH Wolves on Anubis were Fessor, who contributed 22 kills, and Tapewaare, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 9474 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, CPH Wolves held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


ECLOT on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for ECLOT, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for ECLOT on Anubis included Blytz, who contributed 20 kills, and nbqq, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8317 total damage, ECLOT couldn't prevent CPH Wolves from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, ECLOT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date