0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
12%
Overpass
8%
Vertigo
8%
Nuke
8%
Ancient
6%
Mirage
2%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
45%
29
46
Overpass
71%
34
4
Vertigo
64%
33
1
Nuke
65%
37
22
Ancient
70%
40
5
Mirage
56%
34
33
Dust II
0%
2
88
Last 5 maps
Inferno
57%
28
15
Overpass
63%
16
31
Vertigo
56%
32
5
Nuke
57%
28
11
Ancient
64%
28
3
Mirage
58%
26
18
Dust II
0%
0
59
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwwl
- lwlwl
Info
Match analysis of Copenhagen Flames vs SINNERS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Copenhagen Flames and SINNERS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, Nuke, and victory was secured by Copenhagen Flames. The MVP of this match was roeJ.
Copenhagen Flames analytics
The team Copenhagen Flames secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Copenhagen Flames were roeJ contributed 50 kills and nicoodoz contributed 39 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22228 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Copenhagen Flames held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SINNERS analytics
The team SINNERS managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SINNERS were SHOCK contributed 47 kills and ZEDKO contributed 44 kills. 22366 of total damage by SINNERS could not prevent Copenhagen Flames from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SINNERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments