Copenhagen Flames Scoreboard Nuke (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

20

17

11

+3

106

5:1

3

0

7.4

+9%

26

16

4

+10

96

2:2

8

1

7.4

+26%

22

12

5

+10

81

4:1

5

1

7.1

+20%

16

17

5

-1

58

4:2

3

1

6.0

-14%

12

18

3

-6

54

2:3

3

0

4.9

-13%

Total

96

80

28

+16

395

17:9

22

3

6.6

+6%

HAVU Scoreboard Nuke (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

20

7

-2

94

2:2

4

0

6.3

-1%

19

16

1

+3

64

2:2

3

1

6.3

+4%

18

21

6

-3

73

2:5

7

1

6.0

-5%

15

21

2

-6

60

3:3

3

0

5.2

-8%

10

18

4

-8

54

0:5

1

0

4.6

-26%

Total

80

96

20

-16

345

9:17

18

2

5.7

-7%

Teams advantage Nuke (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Copenhagen Flames vs HAVU by the Bo3.gg Team

Copenhagen Flames on Nuke Analysis

Copenhagen Flames demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Copenhagen Flames on Nuke were roeJ, who contributed 20 kills, and Jabbi, who added 26 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 10258 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, Copenhagen Flames held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


HAVU on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for HAVU, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for HAVU on Nuke included xseveN, who contributed 18 kills, and ZOREE, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8968 total damage, HAVU couldn't prevent Copenhagen Flames from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, HAVU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date