Complexity Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

16

7

+2

92

4:0

4

0

7.0

+18%

20

17

2

+3

76

4:2

4

0

6.7

-2%

20

16

3

+4

86

1:5

4

1

6.2

+17%

14

16

3

-2

62

1:5

4

1

5.3

-11%

9

17

4

-8

45

1:1

2

1

4.7

-24%

Total

81

82

19

-1

361

11:13

18

3

6.0

0%

PERA Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

14

7

+10

101

4:3

7

0

7.8

+31%

20

15

2

+5

81

4:1

7

0

6.9

+13%

19

16

7

+3

81

4:0

5

0

6.9

+2%

11

19

9

-8

65

0:3

1

0

4.9

-21%

8

17

3

-9

43

1:4

1

0

3.9

-29%

Total

82

81

28

+1

370

13:11

21

0

6.1

-1%

Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Complexity vs PERA by the Bo3.gg Team

Complexity on Anubis Analysis

Complexity demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Complexity on Anubis were floppy, who contributed 18 kills, and EliGE, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8675 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Complexity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


PERA on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for PERA, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for PERA on Anubis included Ciocardau, who contributed 24 kills, and DGL, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8890 total damage, PERA couldn't prevent Complexity from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, PERA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments1
By date