0 Comments
62
33
23
+29
412
11:4
18
0
Overpass7
+23%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
83%
Anubis
71%
Nuke
57%
Mirage
49%
Inferno
48%
Vertigo
31%
Overpass
14%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
83%
6
0
Anubis
0%
1
1
Nuke
0%
0
1
Mirage
0%
1
1
Inferno
0%
0
0
Vertigo
25%
4
1
Overpass
25%
4
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
72
Anubis
71%
51
1
Nuke
57%
40
4
Mirage
49%
49
8
Inferno
48%
33
8
Vertigo
56%
25
27
Overpass
39%
28
33
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llllw
- wllwl
Info
Match analysis of Comedy Club vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Comedy Club and Zero Tenacity, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was aVN.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were aVN contributed 16 kills and nEMANHA contributed 12 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 6174 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Comedy Club analytics
The team Comedy Club managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Comedy Club were datet contributed 8 kills and twizell contributed 7 kills. 4218 of total damage by Comedy Club could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Comedy Club struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments