0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6.3
6.2
Overpass-0.1
Win Rounds
14
16
Overpass2
Kills
106
105
Overpass-1
Damage
11.35K
11.87K
Overpass518
Economy
667.2K
607.65K
Overpass-59550
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
100%
Nuke
L
50%
Vertigo
40%
Overpass
L
17%
Mirage
0%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
100%
4
0
Nuke
0%
0
1
Vertigo
40%
5
1
Overpass
33%
3
0
Mirage
0%
1
1
Anubis
0%
1
1
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Overpass
50%
2
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
1
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwwl
- lww
Info
Match analysis of Comedy Club vs LOADING by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Comedy Club and LOADING, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by LOADING. The MVP of this match was Middlesex.
LOADING analytics
The team LOADING secured 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LOADING were AMANEK contributed 28 kills and drac contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11870 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LOADING held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Comedy Club analytics
The team Comedy Club managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Comedy Club were Middlesex contributed 30 kills and reyoz contributed 20 kills. 11352 of total damage by Comedy Club could not prevent LOADING from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Comedy Club struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments