0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6.2
5.9
Inferno0.6
Win Rounds
45
37
Inferno3
Kills
279
252
Inferno7
Damage
30.48K
28.64K
Inferno825
Economy
1.75M
1.74M
Inferno52200
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
12.83.8
Player score (round)
35101012
Molotov damage (total/round)
8623.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:20s00:05s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:28s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:33s01:30s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:31s01:30s
Damage (total/round)
38773
Player score (round)
38011012
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Coalesce vs NtK by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Coalesce and NtK, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Overpass, Mirage, Inferno, and victory was secured by Coalesce. The MVP of this match was leaf.
Coalesce analytics
The team Coalesce secured 45 out of 82 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Mirage. They also successfully set 11 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Coalesce were leaf contributed 62 kills and AZUWU contributed 62 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 30482 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Coalesce held their ground firmly, successfully defending 22 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
NtK analytics
The team NtK managed to secure 37 out of 82 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 9 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for NtK were niko contributed 55 kills and Ming0 contributed 50 kills. 28641 of total damage by NtK could not prevent Coalesce from securing the victory
On the defensive side, NtK struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments