Vertigo
4 - 16
Nuke
16 - 12
Ancient
8 - 16
EC Brugge Scoreboard Nuke (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

14

2

+9

82

5:0

5

2

7.5

+20%

21

23

5

-2

81

4:4

5

1

6.3

+5%

18

21

5

-3

80

3:5

3

0

5.8

-2%

13

18

4

-5

51

3:1

2

0

5.3

-7%

16

19

4

-3

69

0:3

2

0

5.2

-2%

Total

91

95

20

-4

363

15:13

17

3

6.0

+3%

Trasko Scoreboard Nuke (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

30

14

6

+16

84

2:3

10

0

7.4

+22%

19

19

6

0

79

1:4

6

0

5.9

-7%

15

17

5

-2

82

2:4

4

0

5.7

+3%

17

23

7

-6

66

5:3

5

0

5.6

-17%

14

18

3

-4

54

3:1

2

0

5.3

-31%

Total

95

91

27

+4

366

13:15

27

0

6.0

-6%

Teams advantage Nuke (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of EC Brugge vs Trasko by the Bo3.gg Team

EC Brugge on Nuke Analysis

EC Brugge demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for EC Brugge on Nuke were Stev0se, who contributed 23 kills, and n0tice, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 10171 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, EC Brugge held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Trasko on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Trasko, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Trasko on Nuke included 7oX1C, who contributed 30 kills, and fostar, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10234 total damage, Trasko couldn't prevent EC Brugge from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, Trasko struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date