EC Brugge Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

19

5

+1

74

2:1

3

0

6.3

+3%

15

20

6

-5

72

1:2

4

1

5.8

-4%

16

20

2

-4

82

3:5

5

0

5.8

-9%

12

18

2

-6

58

1:1

1

1

5.4

-5%

13

20

5

-7

63

2:7

3

1

5.0

-20%

Total

76

97

20

-21

349

9:16

16

3

5.6

-7%

Ambush Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

12

3

+14

100

0:1

9

3

8.5

+51%

25

20

4

+5

104

3:3

6

0

7.3

+14%

18

12

4

+6

79

5:2

6

1

7.2

+17%

15

19

5

-4

69

4:1

3

0

6.0

+1%

12

14

2

-2

57

4:2

4

0

5.7

-9%

Total

96

77

18

+19

409

16:9

28

4

7.0

+15%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of EC Brugge vs Ambush by the Bo3.gg Team

Ambush on Inferno Analysis

Ambush demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Ambush on Inferno were Nono2K, who contributed 26 kills, and Gringo, who added 25 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10237 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Ambush held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


EC Brugge on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for EC Brugge, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for EC Brugge on Inferno included Stev0se, who contributed 20 kills, and n0tice, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8720 total damage, EC Brugge couldn't prevent Ambush from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, EC Brugge struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date