0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
38.612.7
Galil kills on a map
71.8064
Galil damage (avg/round)
26.55.6
Eco wins full buy
1
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
Teammate kills
1
Suicide
1
HE damage (total/round)
8826.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
75%
Vertigo
75%
Dust II
56%
Overpass
31%
Nuke
25%
Train
17%
Mirage
10%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
25%
8
4
Vertigo
25%
8
1
Dust II
44%
9
2
Overpass
44%
9
3
Nuke
25%
8
4
Train
50%
2
11
Mirage
50%
2
13
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
1
4
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Dust II
100%
1
1
Overpass
75%
4
0
Nuke
0%
0
8
Train
67%
6
1
Mirage
60%
5
2
Info
Match analysis of Cloud9 vs Gambit by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Cloud9 and Gambit, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Vertigo, Inferno, and victory was secured by Gambit. The MVP of this match was nafany.
Gambit analytics
The team Gambit secured 32 out of 52 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Inferno. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Gambit were nafany contributed 43 kills and Hobbit contributed 42 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20936 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Gambit held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Cloud9 analytics
The team Cloud9 managed to secure 20 out of 52 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Cloud9 were es3tag contributed 42 kills and ALEX contributed 36 kills. 16461 of total damage by Cloud9 could not prevent Gambit from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Cloud9 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments