0 Comments
82
58
36
+24
418
8:12
22
1
+29%
Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
100%
Inferno
0%
Overpass
0%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
100%
2
1
Inferno
0%
0
1
Overpass
0%
0
1
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwlw
- llw
Info
Map Analysis of CatEvil vs Bloons Tower Defense 6 by the Bo3.gg Team
CatEvil on Anubis Analysis
CatEvil demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for CatEvil on Anubis were zockie, who contributed 21 kills, and wolfteam546, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8364 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, CatEvil held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Bloons Tower Defense 6 on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Bloons Tower Defense 6, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Bloons Tower Defense 6 on Anubis included SaberCat, who contributed 18 kills, and Trzzy, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6608 total damage, Bloons Tower Defense 6 couldn't prevent CatEvil from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Bloons Tower Defense 6 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments