0 Comments
88
65
30
+23
412
11:11
30
1
Anubis6.6
+34%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
41.8161
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4429
Assists on a map
12.14.3808
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Lineups
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
100%
Anubis
100%
Inferno
0%
Overpass
0%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
0
Anubis
100%
1
1
Inferno
0%
0
1
Overpass
0%
0
1
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
100%
1
0
Anubis
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllwl
- w
Info
Match analysis of CatEvil vs AURA Esports by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between CatEvil and AURA Esports, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by CatEvil. The MVP of this match was zockie.
CatEvil analytics
The team CatEvil secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for CatEvil were zockie contributed 22 kills and ANTU4NETTE contributed 25 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9057 overall damage.
On the defensive side, CatEvil held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
AURA Esports analytics
The team AURA Esports managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for AURA Esports were CoolComs contributed 21 kills and Drop contributed 13 kills. 7617 of total damage by AURA Esports could not prevent CatEvil from securing the victory
On the defensive side, AURA Esports struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments