0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
9.42
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.12
Eco wins full buy
1
Player score (round)
35331012
Player score (round)
44831012
Player score (round)
37991012
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
71%
Dust II
21%
Nuke
17%
Ancient
11%
Inferno
10%
Vertigo
10%
Mirage
9%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
6
6
Dust II
25%
4
16
Nuke
33%
3
17
Ancient
25%
4
6
Inferno
54%
13
4
Vertigo
50%
2
7
Mirage
44%
9
2
Last 5 maps
Overpass
29%
7
18
Dust II
46%
28
0
Nuke
50%
10
22
Ancient
14%
7
14
Inferno
44%
32
0
Vertigo
60%
15
3
Mirage
53%
17
11
Info
Match analysis of Case vs SWS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Case and SWS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Case. The MVP of this match was bsd.
Case analytics
The team Case secured 19 out of 34 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Case were leo_drk contributed 30 kills and steel contributed 28 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 14190 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Case held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SWS analytics
The team SWS managed to secure 15 out of 34 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SWS were bsd contributed 34 kills and SaNt0S contributed 14 kills. 11253 of total damage by SWS could not prevent Case from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SWS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments