0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
164.4189
HE damage (avg/round)
14.53.4
Shots (total/round)
9416
Damage (total/round)
38873
Player score (round)
36161010
Player score (round)
34901010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
59%
Anubis
44%
Dust II
30%
Vertigo
15%
Ancient
15%
Mirage
4%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
59%
46
16
Anubis
0%
0
81
Dust II
63%
8
13
Vertigo
58%
26
27
Ancient
33%
39
24
Mirage
59%
41
11
Inferno
50%
44
12
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
55
Anubis
44%
32
12
Dust II
33%
12
6
Vertigo
43%
23
8
Ancient
48%
44
9
Mirage
55%
22
9
Inferno
50%
30
11
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Case vs Solid by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Case and Solid, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Case. The MVP of this match was RICIOLI.
Case analytics
The team Case secured 19 out of 35 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Case were RICIOLI contributed 27 kills and nyezin contributed 28 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 12337 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Case held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Solid analytics
The team Solid managed to secure 16 out of 35 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Solid were gbb contributed 28 kills and destiny contributed 24 kills. 11548 of total damage by Solid could not prevent Case from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Solid struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments