Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:31s01:55s
Player score (round)
34711011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
AK47 kills on a map
136.5888
USP kills on a map
31.6074
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
36%
Vertigo
34%
Anubis
29%
Mirage
14%
Nuke
12%
Ancient
9%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
36%
28
14
Vertigo
54%
13
38
Anubis
0%
0
78
Mirage
57%
35
12
Nuke
55%
33
19
Ancient
46%
35
21
Dust II
0%
0
2
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
1
3
Vertigo
20%
5
2
Anubis
29%
7
2
Mirage
43%
7
1
Nuke
67%
6
3
Ancient
55%
11
1
Dust II
0%
2
1
Info
Match analysis of Case vs Intense by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Case and Intense, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Inferno, Vertigo, Ancient, and victory was secured by Case. The MVP of this match was bsd.
Case analytics
The team Case secured 31 out of 60 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Vertigo. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Case were RCF contributed 42 kills and yepz contributed 42 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20436 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Case held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Intense analytics
The team Intense managed to secure 29 out of 60 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 12 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Intense were bsd contributed 50 kills and diozera contributed 37 kills. 20454 of total damage by Intense could not prevent Case from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Intense struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments