0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:33s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:25s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
47173
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
55%
Anubis
53%
Ancient
29%
Inferno
22%
Mirage
6%
Dust II
2%
Nuke
2%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
55%
29
25
Anubis
0%
0
92
Ancient
39%
44
28
Inferno
49%
63
11
Mirage
44%
43
17
Dust II
59%
22
21
Nuke
52%
50
20
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
28
Anubis
53%
15
3
Ancient
68%
25
3
Inferno
71%
21
4
Mirage
50%
12
14
Dust II
57%
14
15
Nuke
50%
20
4
Last results
Info
Match analysis of Case vs inSanitY by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Case and inSanitY, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by inSanitY. The MVP of this match was pesadelo.
inSanitY analytics
The team inSanitY secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for inSanitY were pesadelo contributed 27 kills and shz contributed 29 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 13660 overall damage.
On the defensive side, inSanitY held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Case analytics
The team Case managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Case were urban0 contributed 25 kills and yepz contributed 21 kills. 12110 of total damage by Case could not prevent inSanitY from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Case struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments