0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Records Inferno
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
52%
Nuke
50%
Vertigo
33%
Overpass
25%
Mirage
21%
Inferno
7%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
2
5
Nuke
0%
0
2
Vertigo
0%
1
9
Overpass
100%
1
4
Mirage
25%
4
3
Inferno
40%
5
0
Anubis
0%
0
8
Last 5 maps
Ancient
52%
21
1
Nuke
50%
8
12
Vertigo
33%
6
2
Overpass
75%
4
9
Mirage
46%
13
1
Inferno
33%
6
9
Anubis
0%
0
19
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllll
- lllll
Info
Map Analysis of Carpe Diem vs FLUFFY AIMERS by the Bo3.gg Team
Carpe Diem on Inferno Analysis
Carpe Diem demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Carpe Diem on Inferno were wiz, who contributed 17 kills, and lake, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8623 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Carpe Diem held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
FLUFFY AIMERS on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for FLUFFY AIMERS, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for FLUFFY AIMERS on Inferno included intra, who contributed 17 kills, and sacrifice, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7802 total damage, FLUFFY AIMERS couldn't prevent Carpe Diem from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, FLUFFY AIMERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments