0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A4 kills on a map
83.6448
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
4912.7
AWP kills on a map
166.5798
AWP damage (avg/round)
63.521.6
Kills on a map
27.9317.5558
Player score (round)
42831012
Shots (total/round)
10216
Shots (total/round)
9116
Damage (total/round)
43373
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
50%
Vertigo
25%
Overpass
21%
Ancient
17%
Nuke
9%
Dust II
5%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
57
Vertigo
69%
13
31
Overpass
71%
28
8
Ancient
67%
15
10
Nuke
67%
33
5
Dust II
53%
30
18
Inferno
78%
18
15
Last 5 maps
Mirage
50%
10
11
Vertigo
44%
9
1
Overpass
50%
2
28
Ancient
50%
10
8
Nuke
58%
12
7
Dust II
58%
12
6
Inferno
78%
9
12
Last results
Info
Match analysis of Bravos vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Bravos and Sharks, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Dust II, Nuke, and victory was secured by Sharks. The MVP of this match was zevy.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks secured 32 out of 44 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Nuke. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sharks were zevy contributed 41 kills and realziN contributed 34 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17551 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 21 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Bravos analytics
The team Bravos managed to secure 12 out of 44 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Bravos were WOOD7 contributed 28 kills and Tuurtle contributed 23 kills. 12273 of total damage by Bravos could not prevent Sharks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Bravos struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments