Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
123
AK47 kills on a map
216.732
AK47 damage (avg/round)
76.325.3
Damage (total/round)
38973
Player score (round)
49341012
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Molotov damage (total/round)
9523.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
80%
Overpass
77%
Vertigo
67%
Ancient
63%
Dust II
53%
Inferno
21%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
80%
25
3
Overpass
77%
22
4
Vertigo
67%
12
23
Ancient
63%
8
9
Dust II
53%
19
17
Inferno
79%
14
10
Mirage
0%
0
41
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
2
Overpass
0%
0
2
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
2
Dust II
0%
1
0
Inferno
100%
1
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Info
Match analysis of Bravos vs MEGAZORD by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Bravos and MEGAZORD, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by Bravos. The MVP of this match was JOTA.
Bravos analytics
The team Bravos secured 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Bravos were JOTA contributed 26 kills and WOOD7 contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10453 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Bravos held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MEGAZORD analytics
The team MEGAZORD managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MEGAZORD were history contributed 23 kills and Kye contributed 22 kills. 9524 of total damage by MEGAZORD could not prevent Bravos from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MEGAZORD struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments