Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
51.616
USP damage (avg/round)
19.54.6
Deagle damage (avg/round)
19.25.4
Molotov damage (avg/round)
82
USP damage (avg/round)
16.34.6
Deagle damage (avg/round)
165.4
Eco wins full buy
1
Eco wins full buy
1
Player score (round)
41501012
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
67%
Mirage
67%
Inferno
57%
Ancient
50%
Nuke
11%
Overpass
8%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
67%
9
17
Mirage
0%
0
29
Inferno
90%
10
8
Ancient
50%
4
7
Nuke
82%
17
1
Overpass
75%
20
2
Dust II
50%
16
11
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
7
Mirage
67%
3
1
Inferno
33%
6
2
Ancient
0%
0
0
Nuke
71%
7
1
Overpass
67%
3
4
Dust II
50%
4
4
Info
Match analysis of Bravos vs 9z by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Bravos and 9z, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Nuke, Dust II, Inferno, and victory was secured by Bravos. The MVP of this match was try.
Bravos analytics
The team Bravos secured 49 out of 91 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Inferno. They also successfully set 8 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Bravos were JOTA contributed 73 kills and WOOD7 contributed 65 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 34805 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Bravos held their ground firmly, successfully defending 29 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
9z analytics
The team 9z managed to secure 42 out of 91 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 10 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for 9z were try contributed 75 kills and dgt contributed 61 kills. 32264 of total damage by 9z could not prevent Bravos from securing the victory
On the defensive side, 9z struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 23 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments