Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
M
100%
Mirage
54%
Overpass
50%
Anubis
36%
Ancient
15%
Inferno
11%
Nuke
11%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
38
Mirage
54%
26
9
Overpass
50%
18
11
Anubis
36%
11
23
Ancient
48%
25
11
Inferno
61%
38
4
Nuke
44%
25
12
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Mirage
0%
0
2
Overpass
0%
0
3
Anubis
0%
0
1
Ancient
33%
3
0
Inferno
50%
2
0
Nuke
33%
3
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwll
- wlwlw
Info
Match analysis of Boca Juniors vs MITOS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Boca Juniors and MITOS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Inferno, and victory was secured by Boca Juniors. The MVP of this match was nacho.
Boca Juniors analytics
The team Boca Juniors secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Boca Juniors were nacho contributed 46 kills and atarax1a contributed 40 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19289 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Boca Juniors held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MITOS analytics
The team MITOS managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MITOS were nasher contributed 38 kills and MRN1 contributed 35 kills. 15345 of total damage by MITOS could not prevent Boca Juniors from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MITOS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments