0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
5.5
6.4
Ancient0.9
Win Rounds
13
16
Ancient3
Kills
83
111
Ancient28
Damage
9.5K
11.57K
Ancient2066
Economy
545.8K
654.3K
Ancient108500
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
62%
Nuke
M
62%
Mirage
57%
Ancient
M
57%
Overpass
50%
Anubis
30%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
62%
34
1
Nuke
38%
21
11
Mirage
57%
23
9
Ancient
43%
21
11
Overpass
50%
14
8
Anubis
30%
10
19
Vertigo
0%
0
33
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
0
Nuke
100%
1
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Ancient
100%
1
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwllw
- w
Info
Match analysis of Boca Juniors vs MITOS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Boca Juniors and MITOS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by MITOS. The MVP of this match was kunzaga.
MITOS analytics
The team MITOS secured 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MITOS were kunzaga contributed 25 kills and MRN1 contributed 25 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11566 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MITOS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Boca Juniors analytics
The team Boca Juniors managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Boca Juniors were atarax1a contributed 20 kills and pavv contributed 16 kills. 9500 of total damage by Boca Juniors could not prevent MITOS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Boca Juniors struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments