0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
67%
Ancient
62%
Overpass
50%
Nuke
24%
Dust II
18%
Vertigo
13%
Mirage
3%
Inferno
1%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
6
Ancient
62%
13
1
Overpass
0%
6
8
Nuke
26%
19
7
Dust II
47%
15
10
Vertigo
80%
5
6
Mirage
43%
7
15
Inferno
44%
27
1
Last 5 maps
Anubis
67%
3
0
Ancient
0%
1
11
Overpass
50%
4
8
Nuke
50%
12
2
Dust II
29%
7
2
Vertigo
67%
3
12
Mirage
40%
10
3
Inferno
45%
11
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlwl
- wwwwl
Info
Match analysis of Boca Juniors vs Corinthians by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Boca Juniors and Corinthians, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Mirage, Inferno, Nuke, and victory was secured by Boca Juniors. The MVP of this match was tomaszin.
Boca Juniors analytics
The team Boca Juniors secured 0 out of 82 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Boca Juniors were tomaszin contributed 70 kills and MRN1 contributed 74 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 31549 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Boca Juniors held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Corinthians analytics
The team Corinthians managed to secure 82 out of 82 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 9 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Corinthians were Demonos contributed 67 kills and proSHOW contributed 57 kills. 29466 of total damage by Corinthians could not prevent Boca Juniors from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Corinthians struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 41 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments