0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AWP kills on a map
206.5798
M4A4 kills on a map
133.6448
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
46.212.7
Deagle kills on a map
51.6964
Player score (round)
35381012
Player score (round)
36141012
Damage (total/round)
41173
Player score (round)
35491012
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
43%
Vertigo
40%
Dust II
28%
Overpass
17%
Mirage
17%
Nuke
5%
Train
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
83%
6
3
Vertigo
40%
5
4
Dust II
88%
8
0
Overpass
50%
2
3
Mirage
67%
6
3
Nuke
38%
8
1
Train
0%
0
14
Last 5 maps
Inferno
40%
5
1
Vertigo
0%
0
10
Dust II
60%
5
2
Overpass
33%
3
0
Mirage
50%
6
2
Nuke
43%
7
1
Train
0%
1
4
Info
Match analysis of BIG vs Spirit by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BIG and Spirit, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Nuke, and victory was secured by BIG. The MVP of this match was syrsoN.
BIG analytics
The team BIG secured 32 out of 50 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Nuke. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BIG were syrsoN contributed 52 kills and tabseN contributed 35 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19592 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Spirit analytics
The team Spirit managed to secure 18 out of 50 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Spirit were mir contributed 38 kills and sdy contributed 31 kills. 17330 of total damage by Spirit could not prevent BIG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Spirit struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments