0 Comments
Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Records Anubis
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
33%
Nuke
29%
Anubis
24%
Inferno
18%
Ancient
12%
Vertigo
2%
Dust II
1%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
25%
4
26
Nuke
29%
7
14
Anubis
40%
15
7
Inferno
25%
8
11
Ancient
52%
25
4
Vertigo
62%
13
4
Dust II
43%
7
0
Last 5 maps
Mirage
58%
57
10
Nuke
0%
0
66
Anubis
64%
56
9
Inferno
43%
35
17
Ancient
64%
72
4
Vertigo
64%
39
8
Dust II
42%
19
15
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwll
- wwwww
Info
Map Analysis of BIG vs Passion UA by the Bo3.gg Team
Passion UA on Anubis Analysis
Passion UA demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Passion UA on Anubis were Jambo, who contributed 15 kills, and ZeRRoFIX, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 6132 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
BIG on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for BIG, as they managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for BIG on Anubis included rigoN, who contributed 11 kills, and syrsoN, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4208 total damage, BIG couldn't prevent Passion UA from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, BIG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments