0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:27s
Galil kills on a map
61.8161
Galil damage (avg/round)
19.95.7
Eco wins full buy
1
Eco wins full buy
1
Eco wins full buy
1
Eco wins full buy
1
Eco wins full buy
1
Damage (total/round)
38473
Shots (total/round)
9116
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
45%
Overpass
39%
Ancient
37%
Inferno
29%
Mirage
28%
Vertigo
22%
Nuke
13%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
55%
20
11
Overpass
57%
14
24
Ancient
62%
37
2
Inferno
70%
10
19
Mirage
33%
9
38
Vertigo
74%
31
3
Nuke
50%
10
27
Last 5 maps
Anubis
100%
1
49
Overpass
18%
11
27
Ancient
25%
36
8
Inferno
41%
17
12
Mirage
61%
46
0
Vertigo
52%
21
17
Nuke
37%
30
1
Info
Match analysis of BIG vs Nexus by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BIG and Nexus, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Vertigo, Ancient, and victory was secured by Nexus. The MVP of this match was XELLOW.
Nexus analytics
The team Nexus secured 29 out of 48 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Ancient. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Nexus were XELLOW contributed 43 kills and BTN contributed 35 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19005 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Nexus held their ground firmly, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
BIG analytics
The team BIG managed to secure 19 out of 48 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for BIG were prosus contributed 38 kills and Krimbo contributed 35 kills. 17726 of total damage by BIG could not prevent Nexus from securing the victory
On the defensive side, BIG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments