0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:28s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:30s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:26s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:35s01:25s
Molotov damage (avg/round)
9.52.1
USP damage (avg/round)
13.64.8
Galil damage (avg/round)
16.75.9
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3014
HE damage (avg/round)
11.43.4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
25%
Anubis
20%
Nuke
19%
Mirage
19%
Ancient
12%
Vertigo
5%
Dust II
3%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
25%
8
11
Anubis
40%
15
7
Nuke
29%
7
14
Mirage
25%
4
26
Ancient
52%
25
4
Vertigo
62%
13
4
Dust II
43%
7
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
41
Anubis
60%
42
2
Nuke
48%
33
1
Mirage
44%
18
12
Ancient
64%
28
14
Vertigo
57%
21
8
Dust II
40%
5
8
Info
Match analysis of BIG vs Insilio by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BIG and Insilio, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by BIG. The MVP of this match was Krimbo.
BIG analytics
The team BIG secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BIG were Krimbo contributed 16 kills and JDC contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 6942 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Insilio analytics
The team Insilio managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Insilio were sugaR contributed 13 kills and Pipw contributed 12 kills. 6395 of total damage by Insilio could not prevent BIG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Insilio struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments