Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP damage (avg/round)
14.94.6
Deagle damage (avg/round)
17.35.4
Deagle kills on a map
61.6964
Deagle damage (avg/round)
24.65.4
Eco wins full buy
1
Shots (total/round)
10116
Player score (round)
35801012
Damage (total/round)
38573
Player score (round)
34731012
Player score (round)
37701012
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
67%
Ancient
28%
Inferno
18%
Overpass
15%
Mirage
8%
Nuke
7%
Vertigo
4%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
67%
21
0
Ancient
25%
8
37
Inferno
38%
8
35
Overpass
45%
11
17
Mirage
44%
18
11
Nuke
40%
20
12
Vertigo
64%
11
9
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
3
22
Ancient
53%
15
3
Inferno
56%
9
18
Overpass
60%
10
15
Mirage
36%
11
17
Nuke
33%
21
5
Vertigo
60%
10
8
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of BIG vs GODSENT by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BIG and GODSENT, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Ancient, and victory was secured by BIG. The MVP of this match was faveN.
BIG analytics
The team BIG secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BIG were faveN contributed 45 kills and syrsoN contributed 36 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20318 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
GODSENT analytics
The team GODSENT managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for GODSENT were TACO contributed 32 kills and dumau contributed 30 kills. 15919 of total damage by GODSENT could not prevent BIG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, GODSENT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments