Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Smoke thrown on a map
3215.0371
Player score (round)
51971012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
4
HE damage (total/round)
9226.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:17s00:05s
Plant at last second
02:14s
Percentage of headshots
41%15%
M4A1 kills on a map
154.6963
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
67%
Dust II
66%
Inferno
28%
Vertigo
21%
Nuke
21%
Overpass
18%
Mirage
4%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
4
45
Dust II
66%
29
0
Inferno
39%
23
22
Vertigo
71%
17
7
Nuke
39%
18
16
Overpass
57%
7
24
Mirage
46%
24
10
Last 5 maps
Ancient
67%
6
22
Dust II
0%
2
26
Inferno
67%
15
7
Vertigo
50%
8
10
Nuke
60%
15
3
Overpass
75%
16
0
Mirage
50%
10
13
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of BIG vs fnatic by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BIG and fnatic, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Mirage, Nuke, and victory was secured by fnatic. The MVP of this match was KRIMZ.
fnatic analytics
The team fnatic secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for fnatic were KRIMZ contributed 76 kills and ALEX contributed 65 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 32247 overall damage.
On the defensive side, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
BIG analytics
The team BIG managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for BIG were tabseN contributed 72 kills and tiziaN contributed 58 kills. 31506 of total damage by BIG could not prevent fnatic from securing the victory
On the defensive side, BIG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments