Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
41.616
HE damage (avg/round)
123.4
USP damage (avg/round)
15.24.6
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
HE damage (total/round)
9426.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:20s00:05s
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:51s00:39s
M4A1 kills on a map
154.6963
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
50%
Nuke
47%
Ancient
39%
Inferno
27%
Overpass
27%
Vertigo
12%
Mirage
6%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
50%
22
0
Nuke
40%
20
3
Ancient
25%
4
32
Inferno
29%
7
31
Overpass
50%
8
26
Vertigo
45%
11
8
Mirage
53%
15
6
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
34
Nuke
87%
15
3
Ancient
64%
14
15
Inferno
56%
9
18
Overpass
77%
13
2
Vertigo
57%
7
14
Mirage
47%
15
12
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of BIG vs fnatic by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BIG and fnatic, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Overpass, and victory was secured by fnatic. The MVP of this match was KRIMZ.
fnatic analytics
The team fnatic secured 32 out of 53 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Overpass. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for fnatic were KRIMZ contributed 47 kills and nicoodoz contributed 45 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22314 overall damage.
On the defensive side, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
BIG analytics
The team BIG managed to secure 21 out of 53 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for BIG were k1to contributed 38 kills and Krimbo contributed 32 kills. 18436 of total damage by BIG could not prevent fnatic from securing the victory
On the defensive side, BIG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments